hi ive had a complete borrowed quantity of14,575 from QQ between may 2009 mar 2011. over this duration we repaid a complete of3148 in interest over this era. We have all my statements from QQ everything that is stating had compensated. Will quick quid spend me personally straight straight straight back when it comes to loans which can be over 6 years of age or have actually no chance was got by me of seeing the older loans refunded?
be therefore grateful for the assistance? if anybody has any experience that is past loans over 6 years of age.
Sara (Financial Obligation Camel) says
Hi Brad, the Financial Ombudsman solution is attempting to choose whether or not to have a look at loans over 6 years of age and these full instances are on hold until it can. You’ll want to get your plaint into QQ asap and then have it to the FOS after 8 days precisely – then if the FOS decides it can’t glance at the older loans, you may continue to have as much as feasible within time.
many thanks Sara. We went along to qq in the 23/8/16 so its just been a couple of weeks thus far. do I need to get directly to the ombudsman now or watch for their 8 response week. im worried im likely to overlook the1000s before the 6 mark year. Perhaps you have been aware of the ombudsman having to pay on loans more than 6 years or they simply frozen until they determine what to accomplish?
appreciat your assistance. many many thanks, Brad
additionally we nevertheless have1200 outstanding I owe with them which
My plaint with QQ got passed away to an adjudicator whom ntacted me personally regarding the 7th of September requesting my bank statements, credit history and I was in financial difficulty if I had ever told QQ. September they gave me a deadline to reply with the details by 14th. Are you aware when they place the same due dates to QQ and, if that’s the case, does which means that that if QQ drag it out it’ll wait my situation a lot more?
Additionally, does anybody have any rough notion of exactly how long it will take for the adjudicator which will make a choice? It is now almost a few months since We first plained to QQ so that it’s actually just starting to drag away 🙁
Fast Quid get back once payday loans in Maine again to Adjudicator suggesting they don’t have actually to inquire of nsumer for spending just before 2014. And they shall maybe perhaps not refund such a thing. also adjudicator ruled in my own benefit asking them to settle all interest and 8% returning to 2010. simply interest es to over 10K. perhaps maybe perhaps perhaps not certain that this is certainly one of many techniques utilized by Quick quid to drag it much longer.
Sara (Financial Obligation Camel) says
“don’t have actually to inquire of for spending prior to 2014” this argument is comparable to a lender that is payday they didn’t need to credit check you before 2014 that we penned this informative article about: s:debtcamel../payday-loan-credit-sres/. It really is theoretically real BUT in the event that you ntinued to borrow from their store thirty days after thirty days (which for you personally appears as if it absolutely was for a long time) then QQ must have taken acunt of the, pointed out that you had been determined by these loans and stopped lending. Or of urse they uld have expected you to definitely offer information regarding your ine and expenditure when they had been worried – simply because they don’t need to do one thing does not mean they uldn’t do so and also this could have been one thing a accountable loan provider need to have nsidered.
A loan provider needs to simply just take acunt of whatever they knew. Then they uldn’t take acunt of that BUT they did know that you were repeatedly borrowing from them suggesting the loans were unaffordable if they didn’t know your expenditure. In addition they ignored this.
It appears as though this might be an extremely case that is good decide to try the Ombudsman.
Many Many Thanks Sara, i shall wait till reaction from adjudicator me know her response as she will have to look at point raised by quick quid and then let. I really hope adjudicator don’t alter her initial choice and stuck to her initial report. I will be concerned given that she may alter her initial decision.
Sara (Financial Obligation Camel) says
Then e back here as (a) you can discuss it with the adjudicator and (b) escalate to the Ombudsman level if needed if she does (and hopefully she won’t as this isn’t really a serious argument from QQ.
Оставить комментарий